1. Mouth enlarged, neck made longer and thinner, hair touched up, eyes enlarged, forehead made smaller, lighting and make up was touched up.
2. Facial features touched up, lighting touched up, shoulders raised, arms and stomach made thinner, legs made longer and thinner, feet made smaller, neck made longer, face made thinner.
3. Entire body made thinner, proportions changed, hair made longer and thicker, lighting touched up.
4. It is ethically acceptable to change the appearance of a person in a photo, but it is not acceptable to promote that photo as real. Changing someone's appearance in a photo doesn't do any harm to anyone as long as the subject agrees to the changes, but trying to pass the altered photo off as the real photo or just not saying the photo was altered is unacceptable.
5. The most ethically wrong would be in a non-fashion environment.
6. I think it is okay to change tiny aspects of a photo or the filter, but nothing that makes the person unrecognizable.
7. I think the differences between fashion photography and photojournalism photography is that in fashion, photos are doctored at another person's expense and are used as a photo to look up to and usually false advertise a product. In photo journalism, photographers edit photos for the learning experience and to please others, and I thinks it's more acceptable when photos containing things other than people are edited.
8. Fashion photography is an allusion compared to reality, and photojournalism is just a way to make things more naturally appreciated and beautiful.
9. I think you are showing us these three videos to clue us into what really happens to edited photos in fashion photography. These videos were a huge insight to me because I knew photos were doctored, but I didn't realize how extreme it was.
10. I think none of these videos are about men because most aspects in fashion photography appeal to women, their opinions and their style.
No comments:
Post a Comment